At the very start of this year we started off with a preliminary piece of work, which was 'The Encounter' where we used different techniques and camera language. The first area that looking back on I have mixed feelings on is digital technology. For example the first thing that we can denote from this is the use of many different types of shots, for example we used closeups, mid-shots, over the shoulder shots and two shots. Here are some examples.
All these shots were staged at different points in the preliminary task, the reason that I think that this was a success was because we managed to show most of the action that was going on in the scene and top of that we were able to easily show the different emotions of the people in each shot, for example in the first screenshot of the closeup. This was during a question that was being asked and was quickly followed by anger and this closeup allowed you to see the characters frustration. In addition the second person who was the hostage was able to show fear or anxiety through the closeup. The two-shots for example where there is the aggression show towards the hostage at 0:36 shows direct involvement and actions of both people and allows the viewer to see how each person is affected by the other.
Another thing that I thought was successful about this preliminary piece was the use of a creative storyline or narrative, most of the other examples were set in a school but in this one it was a hostage situation and meant that you could see that there was one figure who had superior authority. Another reason why I think this was a good thing was because it helped us be creative with the ideas that we wanted to include such as tension and ambiguity of what was happening. The scene hinted at an idea for a story but never actually gave it away and I think that this will help us in the future as it will allow us to think of more creative ways or ideas about a story.
Research was key in this project, we had done a lot of planning up until the point where we made our opening sequence, this was a success I believe because it helped us to create deep characters and narratives. For example in our opening sequence we managed to actually create a main character that didn't feel empty or meaningless and really would be good at keeping peoples attention in a film.
During the post-production phase we did a lot of editing inside of different software. For example the most notable ones for our preliminary work and our opening sequence were iMovie, Final Cut, LiveType and Adobe Photoshop/Illustrator. The reason that I felt we had succeeded by using these technologies was because we learned new skills as in how to use each software, since they all have a different infrastructure. iMovie wasn't essential but for the preliminary task it was a quick alternative that allowed us to do basic editing quickly as it didn't require rendering to preview clips. On the other hand I preferred using Final Cut. When we were using Final Cut we were able to add colour corrections and visual effects, for example the flashback scenes had a vignette effect applied to it, although it is very subtle. in addition to visual effects I think we succeeded in timing the video, for example in the scene of our opening sequence where the policeman's dialogue matches up in to different shots, giving us more flexibility on shot types and not having to limit because of dialogue, I think this gave the film a more natural feeling to it.
Research and planning was our strongest point out of all the different areas, for example when we were creating the shooting script, we had a very detailed script that included all of our shots and what would happen, which we followed. We also managed to accurately portray different characters and their roles for example by researching archetypes and camera language in the preliminary work the interrogator was held in a low angle shot to make him look more menacing. By being able to plan this in a shooting script or storyboard which we did it really helped to show that he was the bad person.
Another example of how we succeeded during the research stage was because we were able to plan when we would record different shots on certain days and times and this meant that there was less rushing to do in the final moments.
However there were also a number of different weaknesses that i can point out with all of these different aspects, when we were using digital technology the amount of time that we would set aside wasn't always enough, which meant that we had to work on our planning. This was one thing that I can further back up as we were only able to get the police to help record with us during the opening sequence nearing the deadline and for the preliminary, the conference room which we would use to record in would often be used by other people. This impacted our final outcome as parts of it would be noticeably less quality than other areas of the piece.
When it comes to digital technology I feel that my uses of different online sources was lacking this year, for example I would typically use only blogger, YouTube and a few other things from time to time, this really limited what I was capable of doing in terms of presentation. If I had used some other sites I think that the actual aesthetics of this blog would have been improved. In addition to the lack of technology use I feel like my camera work could have been better, I struggled at some points to avoid using a lot of long shots and I feel like this hadn't really improved much at all since the start of the year. However since I was able to learn some new skills since the start of the year I was able to improve on some of the new techniques and rules such as the shot-reverse-shot, 180 degree rule and rule of thirds, which I think I implemented well and imp[roved on since the start of the year.
Creativity wasn't something that I feel was an issue during this year since my ideas from last year during GCSE and the start of this year were quite abstract, for example the idea of a hostage situation instead of a regular conversation. However if there was on issue that I would point out it would be that I was over ambitious this year, it was difficult to record scenes based on the limited time, equipment and budget we had. For instance we could have made terrorism much more believable in the plot if we had these resources as well as the hostage situation in the preliminary.
Finally when it came to post-production I feel that the biggest issue I had this year was trying to do to much in such a limited time span, I wanted to add a lot more cuts and clips as well as sound effects and colour correcting but in combination with render times and the deadline it was just not a feasible.
After looking over this year until this point I would say that it was moderately successful since we were able to get things done on time for the most part and all our research was well done but all of the negatives were very limiting in making the overall projects look good. I feel as though they looked quite amateur and would definitely want to address all the negative points for next year. Since we wont have any more time than this year to work on the music video I will definitely make sure that the video isn't overly ambitious.
![]() | |
| 0:26 |
![]() |
| 0:22 |
![]() |
| 0:36 |
All these shots were staged at different points in the preliminary task, the reason that I think that this was a success was because we managed to show most of the action that was going on in the scene and top of that we were able to easily show the different emotions of the people in each shot, for example in the first screenshot of the closeup. This was during a question that was being asked and was quickly followed by anger and this closeup allowed you to see the characters frustration. In addition the second person who was the hostage was able to show fear or anxiety through the closeup. The two-shots for example where there is the aggression show towards the hostage at 0:36 shows direct involvement and actions of both people and allows the viewer to see how each person is affected by the other.
Another thing that I thought was successful about this preliminary piece was the use of a creative storyline or narrative, most of the other examples were set in a school but in this one it was a hostage situation and meant that you could see that there was one figure who had superior authority. Another reason why I think this was a good thing was because it helped us be creative with the ideas that we wanted to include such as tension and ambiguity of what was happening. The scene hinted at an idea for a story but never actually gave it away and I think that this will help us in the future as it will allow us to think of more creative ways or ideas about a story.
Research was key in this project, we had done a lot of planning up until the point where we made our opening sequence, this was a success I believe because it helped us to create deep characters and narratives. For example in our opening sequence we managed to actually create a main character that didn't feel empty or meaningless and really would be good at keeping peoples attention in a film.
![]() |
| Vignette effect at 0:37 |
Research and planning was our strongest point out of all the different areas, for example when we were creating the shooting script, we had a very detailed script that included all of our shots and what would happen, which we followed. We also managed to accurately portray different characters and their roles for example by researching archetypes and camera language in the preliminary work the interrogator was held in a low angle shot to make him look more menacing. By being able to plan this in a shooting script or storyboard which we did it really helped to show that he was the bad person.
Another example of how we succeeded during the research stage was because we were able to plan when we would record different shots on certain days and times and this meant that there was less rushing to do in the final moments. However there were also a number of different weaknesses that i can point out with all of these different aspects, when we were using digital technology the amount of time that we would set aside wasn't always enough, which meant that we had to work on our planning. This was one thing that I can further back up as we were only able to get the police to help record with us during the opening sequence nearing the deadline and for the preliminary, the conference room which we would use to record in would often be used by other people. This impacted our final outcome as parts of it would be noticeably less quality than other areas of the piece.
![]() |
| An example of what I could have used - emaze |
Creativity wasn't something that I feel was an issue during this year since my ideas from last year during GCSE and the start of this year were quite abstract, for example the idea of a hostage situation instead of a regular conversation. However if there was on issue that I would point out it would be that I was over ambitious this year, it was difficult to record scenes based on the limited time, equipment and budget we had. For instance we could have made terrorism much more believable in the plot if we had these resources as well as the hostage situation in the preliminary.
Finally when it came to post-production I feel that the biggest issue I had this year was trying to do to much in such a limited time span, I wanted to add a lot more cuts and clips as well as sound effects and colour correcting but in combination with render times and the deadline it was just not a feasible.
After looking over this year until this point I would say that it was moderately successful since we were able to get things done on time for the most part and all our research was well done but all of the negatives were very limiting in making the overall projects look good. I feel as though they looked quite amateur and would definitely want to address all the negative points for next year. Since we wont have any more time than this year to work on the music video I will definitely make sure that the video isn't overly ambitious.

































